Social network modalities
The fuss last week about asymmetric follow got me thinking about communication modalities in social networks. It seems to me that this is yet another case where there’s nothing really new, just fresh perspective. Social networks appear to support the same modalities as data networks, so perhaps it’s worth looking at the old labels and seeing how this applies to emerging use cases:
The classic 1-2-1 pattern. This is what happens with instant messages (IMs), direct messages (DMs) and to an extent good old email (though the use of distribution lists fogs the picture a little there). It’s also what happens with the @name convention in microblogging or something like directed social bookmarking.
In data networks we use multicast groups, and it seems that in social networks the groups concept is the same, so when we post a link, update a status or whatever then it goes by default to a group defined by our immediate social graph (our ‘friends’), or it can be directed at a specific group.
With both unicast and multicast there are clearly ways to have some privacy, with a trade off against the broader collaboration potential. This depends to some extent on whether the defaults are private or public, and whether users normally tinker with those defaults.
This is the uncontrolled, anybody who’s listening option. There’s probably an important distinction between broadcast and public multicast, and this may well be the nub of what asymmetric follow is all about. Frankly I don’t see that much difference between pub/sub asymmetries in regular blogging and microblogging.
Filed under: e2.0 | 3 Comments
Tags: asymetric follow, broadcast, multicast, privacy, social network, unicast
Raspberry Pi Downloads
- Making an image file from an SD card on Windows
- Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystick
- Boot2Docker on Hyper-V
- AirPlay on Raspberry Pi the easy way
- Forwarding DNS queries to AWS VPC resolvers
- Raspberry Pi Satellite TV
- Three doesn't feel at home on 4G networks
- Apache 2.2 on Ubuntu 14.04
- Using Overlay file system with Docker on Ubuntu
- Using Amazon EC2 as a web proxy
Lee on Three doesn’t feel at ho… Chris Swan on OpenELEC dev builds for Raspbe… Juan on OpenELEC dev builds for Raspbe… witchmaster on Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystic… Sean on Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystic…
- The first rule of data science
- Blockchain performance might always suck, but that’s not a problem
- Quaker Oats threatens to sue us
- EMC Launches Polly, Open Source Storage Scheduling Project for Containers
- A bomb just dropped in endpoint security… and I’m not sure anyone noticed
- It depends what you study, not where
- TSA lines grow to 3 hours, snake outside the terminals, with no end in sight
- CloudFlare Origin CA
- Hold on a sec. When did HDDs get SSD-style workload rate limits?
- Satoshi: how Craig Wright's deception worked
- RT @adrianco: Video of my talk @CraftConf last week on The Evolution of Microservices ustream.tv/recorded/86151… 1 hour ago
- @abnerg platform 1 hour ago
- RT @EvanSinar: The first rule of data science - The Berkeley Science Review ow.ly/4nrgE0 #datascience https://t.co/U6oYSFEqoz 9 hours ago
- RT @krishnan: Unfortunately, many fail to realize that it is the ultimate lock-in twitter.com/paulycomtois/s… 11 hours ago
- RT @timbray: Descriptive beer markup FTW! uncommongoods.com/product/html-b… 11 hours ago