Social network modalities
The fuss last week about asymmetric follow got me thinking about communication modalities in social networks. It seems to me that this is yet another case where there’s nothing really new, just fresh perspective. Social networks appear to support the same modalities as data networks, so perhaps it’s worth looking at the old labels and seeing how this applies to emerging use cases:
The classic 1-2-1 pattern. This is what happens with instant messages (IMs), direct messages (DMs) and to an extent good old email (though the use of distribution lists fogs the picture a little there). It’s also what happens with the @name convention in microblogging or something like directed social bookmarking.
In data networks we use multicast groups, and it seems that in social networks the groups concept is the same, so when we post a link, update a status or whatever then it goes by default to a group defined by our immediate social graph (our ‘friends’), or it can be directed at a specific group.
With both unicast and multicast there are clearly ways to have some privacy, with a trade off against the broader collaboration potential. This depends to some extent on whether the defaults are private or public, and whether users normally tinker with those defaults.
This is the uncontrolled, anybody who’s listening option. There’s probably an important distinction between broadcast and public multicast, and this may well be the nub of what asymmetric follow is all about. Frankly I don’t see that much difference between pub/sub asymmetries in regular blogging and microblogging.
Filed under: e2.0 | 3 Comments
Tags: asymetric follow, broadcast, multicast, privacy, social network, unicast
Raspberry Pi Downloads
- Docker Networking
- Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystick
- Making an image file from an SD card on Windows
- Raspberry Pi TV/PVR
- Using Amazon EC2 as a web proxy
- AirPlay on Raspberry Pi the easy way
- Boot2Docker on Hyper-V
- Making OpenELEC images for Raspberry Pi
- Raspberry Pi Satellite TV
- Connecting Docker containers between VMs with VXLAN
Pragnesh on Stellaris Launchpad as a JTAG… Jerry on Raspberry Pi Arcade WRTnode team on wrthelp – a demo app for… wrthelp – a de… on OpenWRT on TP-Link TL-WR2… Technology Short Tak… on Connecting Docker containers b…
- Butterfly Labs mined bitcoins on customers’ boxes before shipping
- Protect yourself from the hidden dangers of `curl | sh`
- Cops Seize Car When Told To Get A Warrant, Tell Owner That's What He Gets For 'Exercising His Rights'
- Isis's letter to the west
- FPGAs for Dummies [pdf]
- The New Stack Analysts, Show 15: Myth, Lore and Religion in the New Cloud
- Airlines crack down on ‘mileage runs’
- Container Camp 2014
- More on Useful Proof of Work
- You can be a kernel hacker!
- OK - I get it - base 9 product numbering - totally makes sense. 19 minutes ago
- .@TfLOfficial Oyster Online seems to have melted down (possibly not coping with the load caused by 16+ expirations) http://t.co/KK2uLsVaS9 3 hours ago
- @cardmagic everybody that I lent my dead tree copy of Accelerando to commented on the weird dreams it brought them 12 hours ago
- .@cloudchantv that quote might be misinterpreted out of context. Let's hope people watch the video. Docker is easier to adopt than VMs. 1 day ago
- RT @eastdakota: Introducing Universal SSL: @CloudFlare doubles the size of the encrypted web blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-un… 1 day ago