Social network modalities
The fuss last week about asymmetric follow got me thinking about communication modalities in social networks. It seems to me that this is yet another case where there’s nothing really new, just fresh perspective. Social networks appear to support the same modalities as data networks, so perhaps it’s worth looking at the old labels and seeing how this applies to emerging use cases:
The classic 1-2-1 pattern. This is what happens with instant messages (IMs), direct messages (DMs) and to an extent good old email (though the use of distribution lists fogs the picture a little there). It’s also what happens with the @name convention in microblogging or something like directed social bookmarking.
In data networks we use multicast groups, and it seems that in social networks the groups concept is the same, so when we post a link, update a status or whatever then it goes by default to a group defined by our immediate social graph (our ‘friends’), or it can be directed at a specific group.
With both unicast and multicast there are clearly ways to have some privacy, with a trade off against the broader collaboration potential. This depends to some extent on whether the defaults are private or public, and whether users normally tinker with those defaults.
This is the uncontrolled, anybody who’s listening option. There’s probably an important distinction between broadcast and public multicast, and this may well be the nub of what asymmetric follow is all about. Frankly I don’t see that much difference between pub/sub asymmetries in regular blogging and microblogging.
Filed under: e2.0 | 3 Comments
Tags: asymetric follow, broadcast, multicast, privacy, social network, unicast
Raspberry Pi Downloads
- Making an image file from an SD card on Windows
- Asus Tinker Board - First Impressions
- Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystick
- Apache 2.2 on Ubuntu 14.04
- Forwarding DNS queries to AWS VPC resolvers
- Howto stunnel from HTTPS to HTTPS
- Three doesn't feel at home on 4G networks
- Using Overlay file system with Docker on Ubuntu
- Howto - Factory Reset iLO 4 on HP Microserver Gen8
- AirPlay on Raspberry Pi the easy way
The Politics of Data… on The Politics of Data Hello DXC – Ne… on Goodbye CSC, Hello DXC Te… kevinphilp on Goodbye CSC, Hello DXC Te… Lisa Braun on A day in the life of a CT… Steve Williams on Asus Tinker Board – Firs…
- Dangerous Drinks and How To Spot Them - Imbibe Magazine
- Introducing Cloudflare Orbit: A Private Network for IoT Devices
- FCC chair is looking to end #netneutrality.
- Why numbers are sometimes better than words. What people think you say “almost certainly", “probably", or “highly unlikely”
- Things I Wish I Knew Before Using Jenkins Pipelines
- DevOps on Windows Hosted Roundtable - Skelton Thatcher Consulting
- What is DevOps? – Cindy Sridharan
- Tinker Board | Single-board Computer | ASUS United Kingdom
- How just 639 people could have stopped a Tory election majority
- Nuh-uh, Google, you WILL hand over emails stored on foreign servers, says US judge
- RT @fintanr: Consistent with a number of recent Hadoop related conversations. Data infra is dialtone, and Hadoop has been made into complic… 4 hours ago
- RT @bengoldacre: This is the politics of grievance. Of pretending other people are to blame for your problems. This is what ISIS and UKIP d… 4 hours ago
- RT @buggylina: Great ideas from the feedback fairy @maaretp #CraftConf #testing https://t.co/n9Xoxie2yL 7 hours ago
- RT @snyksec: Snyk for Serverless is live! Monitor your @heroku apps and @awscloud lambda functions for vulnerable dependencies! https://t.c… 13 hours ago
- RT @adrianco: I was quoting this case from memory in recent discussions with some big banks, and managed to dig out the original reference.… 13 hours ago