Social network modalities
The fuss last week about asymmetric follow got me thinking about communication modalities in social networks. It seems to me that this is yet another case where there’s nothing really new, just fresh perspective. Social networks appear to support the same modalities as data networks, so perhaps it’s worth looking at the old labels and seeing how this applies to emerging use cases:
The classic 1-2-1 pattern. This is what happens with instant messages (IMs), direct messages (DMs) and to an extent good old email (though the use of distribution lists fogs the picture a little there). It’s also what happens with the @name convention in microblogging or something like directed social bookmarking.
In data networks we use multicast groups, and it seems that in social networks the groups concept is the same, so when we post a link, update a status or whatever then it goes by default to a group defined by our immediate social graph (our ‘friends’), or it can be directed at a specific group.
With both unicast and multicast there are clearly ways to have some privacy, with a trade off against the broader collaboration potential. This depends to some extent on whether the defaults are private or public, and whether users normally tinker with those defaults.
This is the uncontrolled, anybody who’s listening option. There’s probably an important distinction between broadcast and public multicast, and this may well be the nub of what asymmetric follow is all about. Frankly I don’t see that much difference between pub/sub asymmetries in regular blogging and microblogging.
Filed under: e2.0 | 3 Comments
Tags: asymetric follow, broadcast, multicast, privacy, social network, unicast
Raspberry Pi Downloads
@ceejay on BeagleBone Black Rube Goldberg… Mike on Lenovo fail me again Classes of tablet |… on What Are People Doing On All T… Classes of tablet |… on Abandoning Apple subscription in RPI on OpenELEC dev builds – a…
- BoA - Bitcoin: a first assessment
- The Moore's Law blowout sale is ending, Broadcom's CTO says
- Don't Give Up On OpenStack
- 75% of American silent feature films lost
- Man plugs in electric car and is arrested for theft
- German Court Says CEO Of Open Source Company Liable For 'Illegal' Functions Submitted By Community
- The Problem with EULAs
- Backblaze: Enterprise drives aren't worth the price premium
- Stop Saying Bitcoin Transactions Aren’t Reversible
- Elliptic Curve Cryptography in Practice
- RT @anthemis: "It is, in fact, ironic that Bitcoin is often touted as anonymous. It’s not. Bitcoin is, instead,..." tmblr.co/Zzxagu10ZBQMQ 21 hours ago
- RT @etherealmind: It's the week before Christmas & there was not a sound. The network was frozen and couldn't go down. THANKS ITIL!!!! Two … 1 day ago
- RT @fhr: Fined £50 for "cycling on pavement" (from bike rack to road). Apparently, police response to cyclist deaths is zero tolerance on c… 2 days ago
- The worst thing about post Blair Britain is that the compulsive lying and manipulation we so gently call 'spin' has become everyday normal 2 days ago
- @dalmaer @Beaker funny thing is that everything after F60M is superfluous fluff 3 days ago