Document management sucks! There – I said it. I challenge you to prove me wrong.
I haven’t yet found a document management system (DMS) that’s fit for purpose, and I think I know why.
Paper is two dimensional
It’s about the metaphor. Specifically the dimensionality of the metaphor. Pieces of paper are 2D, and so are document management systems. This makes sense in the physical world. I can only put my piece of paper in one place, which I might call a file or a folder or whatever. Computer file systems copy this metaphor, and document management systems copy it again – they just call a folder a workspace to make it sound more collaborative.
The real world is multidimensional
And we have IT abstractions that can be too. When I write an engagement letter to a client I shouldn’t be forced to ‘file’ it in a ‘folder’ called ‘engagement letter’ or ‘clientX’. I should be able to give it multiple attributes (tags), and virtual ‘folders’ can be assembled from those attributes. Thus if I want to see a library of engagement letters I select that tag, if I want to see all of the stuff relating to clientX I choose their tag.
‘Oh’, I hear you cry, ‘tagging takes effort, and people will forget’. That’s a real problem, but I think it’s solvable. We stopped trying to categorise everything into some massive (2D) taxonomy a long time ago, and decided that search would fill the gap. Search is good when it works, but it can be disorderly – hence the glib one liner ‘why are you searching when you should be finding’. The right way to do this is to make search part of the process at the front end rather than the back end. Clippy returns – ‘it looks like you’re saving an engagement letter to clientX – shall I tag that “engagement letter” and “clientX” for you?’.
The Social Aspect
We’ve seen great usage of tags already in social bookmarking sites like del.icio.us, so why not bolt on that functionality to document management (after all a ‘web page’ and a ‘document’ are essentially variations of the same thing). This raises the question of whose tags – my tag, your tag, the company tag. But who cares – this is what educated suggestions can help with, particularly when search can identify similarities with other documents. As JP wrote earlier in the week, Social Objects are important, sadly I fear that document management systems are anti-social. A DMS may provide a ‘shared space’ for a document as a social object, but it fails to provide rich support for the other activities that should be taking place. Yes, there’s metadata in a DMS, but not typically the sort of open and collaborative metadata that JP is referring to. This is where I can get excited some more about initiatives like Open Bookmarks (which is best described here). Not only does this potentially solve the state synchronisation issues I was concerned about last month, but it provides the perfect platform for social interactions around documents – a means to provide curation.
This is an area that can’t be ignored. As soon as you get into a conversation about accessing documents you’re quickly into a conversation about preventing access to documents. I think this isn’t as hard a problem as people make out. Identity Management practices can be applied equally to people and the documents they interact with. People have attributes (like ‘Director’ and ‘works in HR’ and ‘based in ‘Switzerland’) and these can be synthesised into abstract roles (like ‘Swiss HR Directors’). Documents also have attributes (tags) that can be used to provide not just logical views as discussed above, but logical groupings for the purpose of security policies (for example all documents relating to ClientX can only be seen by the ClientX project team, except NDAs and engagement letters, which are also visible by legal). The policy here provides a mapping between document views and people roles, and should be fairly self explanatory (and easy to audit).
Now can somebody please build this for me?
PS This is yet another reason why we shouldn’t have software patents. Firstly this whole thing is obvious (at least to me), and secondly Xerox have this, but in their usual style appear to have done precious little with it. All that’s achieved here is blocking a startup from implementing (or robbing them blind later for ‘infringement’).
Filed under: e2.0, security | 4 Comments
Tags: annotation, attribute, bookmark, dms, document, document management system, DRM, e2.0, enterprise 2.0, file, folder, role, search, security, social, social object, tag, tagging, tags
Raspberry Pi Downloads
- Making an image file from an SD card on Windows
- Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystick
- Forwarding DNS queries to AWS VPC resolvers
- Asus Tinker Board - First Impressions
- Howto - Factory Reset iLO 4 on HP Microserver Gen8
- Three doesn't feel at home on 4G networks
- Apache 2.2 on Ubuntu 14.04
- The Politics of Data
- Using Overlay file system with Docker on Ubuntu
- Howto stunnel from HTTPS to HTTPS
Chris Swan on Asus Tinker Board – Firs… KillerDAN on Asus Tinker Board – Firs… GARETH HAY on Asus Tinker Board – Firs… Chris Swan on Offshoring my Android tablet… Nealo on Offshoring my Android tablet…
- MBAs as CEOs: Some troubling evidence
- The Myth of the U.S. Immigration Crisis
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds
- Continuous Delusion at the Infrastructure Layer
- Optimist, Pessimist, Scientist
- Government accused of trying to kill off UK solar industry before it can become cheapest form of electricity
- A Clinton-era tech law has quietly, profoundly redefined the very nature of property in the IoT age
- PuTTY 0.68 has been released
- Netflix Stethoscope
- The Edge of Reason
- RT @JoeBaguley: In London today? Train home delayed/cancelled? Fancy free beer & pizza? Come to CloudCamp this evening - https://t.co/zNIts… 1 hour ago
- @etherealmind @JoeBaguley confirmed 6 hours ago
- "MBAs as CEOs: Some troubling evidence" mintzberg.org/blog/mbas-as-c… I doubt @swardley will be surprised by this. They should teach mapping 8 hours ago
- RT @rezendi: "The possibility of a police state poses a far greater danger ... than the imagined threat of immigration." https://t.co/n3g6p… 9 hours ago
- RT @swardley: Fabulous -> Why facts don't change our minds - newyorker.com/magazine/2017/… 9 hours ago