Congress – cheaper than you thought
I don’t need to write extensively here about the dangers of regulatory capture by corporate interests. Larry Lessig already wrote ‘One Way Forward‘, and he does a far better job than I ever could. My friend Robert Dunne recently made an astute observation in the wake of the PRISM scandal:
Access to material from the security services seems to be a feature of being part of the ‘ruling party’, which I’d add to what’s already been articulated by Charles Stross in ‘A Bad Dream – Is the United Kingdom a one party state?’ and Jon Evans with ‘Technology and the Ruling Party‘. I’d guess that access to intelligence reports is something like a drug for those in power[1]. It’s a hard habit to kick, but last week the US Congress had a try at putting the Obama regime on cold turkey with the Amash defence bill amendment.
The vote was pretty close at 217:205, and crossed party lines, which has inspired some deeper digging. It turns out that pro-NSA Congressional voters got twice the defense industry campaign contributions:
So if we accept that the votes were bought then it was remarkably cheap – 217 x ($41,635-$18,765) = $4.963m. Considering what the NSA is throwing around each year that seems like a total bargain – less than $5m in political contributions gets the Beltway bandits a Mulligan any time that they need one.
I’d like to see a more detailed analysis of the Congresscritters involved. Defence contributions is likely just another part of the ‘ruling party’ syndrome. My guess would be that the 217 cross party lines and get greater defence contributions because they’re time seasoned politicos who’ve had plenty of time (and money) to be coaxed away from any ideals they might have once held dear.
Of course things were different on Jimmy Carter’s watch. The US had functioning democracy then and FISA was brought in to protect citizens (without it seems much thought for those to whom the 4th amendment doesn’t apply – of course that was before the US hosted most of the entire planet’s communication infrastructure). What a shame Carter didn’t shore things up with some solid legislation to limit the effects of corporate contributions in politics.
On the bright side the perception of corruption in the US (and UK) is low. That’s what you get when the mass media is bought and paid for by the same people who own the ruling party.
Notes
[1] For a good account of how the SIGINT agency tail started to wag the foreign policy dog I can highly recommend ‘GCHQ‘ by Richard Aldrich.
Filed under: politics | Leave a Comment
Tags: Beltway bandits, bribery, corruption, FISA, Larry Lessig, one way forward, PRISM, regulatory capture, ruling party, SIGINT, spying
Subscribe
Search
Top Posts
- Getting more from a British Gas UP2 Timer
- Howto - Factory Reset iLO 4 on HP Microserver Gen8
- Using Amazon EC2 as a web proxy
- Howto: secure your DNS with a Raspberry Pi, Unbound and Cloudflare 1.1.1.1
- 5 6 7 Rs of Cloud Migration
- Raspberry Pi GPIO Joystick
- Howto stunnel from HTTPS to HTTPS
- Letters to Craig Murray #15
- ZeroSSL API - The missing examples
- Review - GL.iNet GL-MT1300 Travel Router
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Tim Coote on Ross Anderson RIP iain on Skiing in Espace Killy (Val… Chris Swan on Getting more from a British Ga… Murray Cowell on Getting more from a British Ga… JL on AI MacGuffin Pinboard.in bookmarks
- Here's why RISC-V is important
- The marshmallow paradox – VAT or no VAT?
- Doctrine, Droids, & Dragons: An Impassioned Plea for Unconventional Professional Development
- SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 and BA.2 breakthrough infections boost antibody responses to early Omicron subvariants but not BQ.1.1 or XBB.1.5 - ScienceDirect
- How Many Calories Do You Really Burn on Cardio Machines?
- America’s animal shelters are overwhelmed. Pets – and staff – are at breaking point
- Netflix Secret Codes 2024: Every Movie & Series Category on Netflix
- Pharmaceutical giant Bayer is getting rid of bosses and asking nearly 100,000 workers to ‘self-organize’
- View of The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence
- [no title]
Blogroll
- 451 CAOS Theory
- Adam Bosworth’s Weblog
- Andrew McAfee
- Behavioural Investing
- CapitalSCF
- Carpe Visum
- causticTech
- Charles Stross
- confused of calcutta
- Cory Doctorow
- Craig Murray
- Dan Creswell’s Weblog
- Dark Reading
- Dilbert Blog
- DJW
- Doc Searls
- Don Box’s Spoutlet
- Dopplr
- Eben Moglen
- Enhyper
- Financial Cryptography
- Fred Destin
- Freedom to Tinker
- Graham Glass, etc.
- Greg Matter
- Hugh Grant
- Internet Alchemy
- Invisible Things
- James Strachan’s Weblog
- John Merrells
- Jon Udel
- Justice League
- Kim Cameron
- Lambda the Ultimate – Programming Languages Weblog
- Light Blue Touchpaper
- Loosely Coupled weblog
- Luke Hutteman’s Weblog
- Marc Andreeson
- Nick Selby
- ongoing
- Otaku, Cedric’s weblog
- Park Paradigm
- Paul Graham
- Phil Becker
- Pi4Tech
- PJKtech
- Radovan Janecek: Nothing Impersonal
- rants
- Richard Monson-Haefel
- SAAS
- Schneier on Security
- Service Oriented Enterprise
- Simon Phipps’s Blog
- techno.blog(“Dion”)
- The BileBlog
- THE GRID BLOG
- Tim Oren’s Due Diligence
- timbl’s blog
- virtualization.info
- WebMink
- WebServices.org
- XKCD
Categories
No Responses Yet to “Congress – cheaper than you thought”