Brewster’s Trillions

27Jul26

TL;DR

The AI infrastructure bubble has reached a point where companies just can’t actually spent all the money they might (notionally) have allocated. There might be money on a balance sheet somewhere, but good luck exchanging it for actual GPUs, or HVAC, or HVAC installers, or… When the sums of money get large enough it turns out that it’s difficult to actually spend it. That was the setup for George Barr McCutcheon’s 1902 novel ‘Brewster’s Millions‘ (and the multitude of film adaptations). Of course the sums of money now are MUCH, MUCH, BIGGER, which is why I’ve taken to calling this Brewster’s Trillions (or the Brewster’s Trillions problem).

Brewster’s Millions

The plot device of the book is that Montgomery Brewster must spend $1M within a year in order to inherit a much larger sum (timing and values vary in the films). This turns out to be more difficult that it initially seems, as he has to finish with no assets, and there are limitations on gifts, donations etc.

Various comedy sub plots get built around the notion that when you have lots of money, it’s hard to actually spent it all, especially if you’re working to a deadline.

AI spending

This chart from Fin Moorhouse got lots of attention a few months back:

‘The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects’

But news is starting to come in that stuff planned for 2026 isn’t actually happening[1]. It turns out that when you buy ALL the stuff, whether that’s land for data centres, or GPUs to run in them, or HVACs to keep them cool, or energy to power all that, or contractors to do the installation work and maintenance; you can’t just show up with more money and buy more of the same. That’s because the earlier buying has exhausted supply, and whilst economics 1.01 will kick in and inflate prices (viz RAM[2]) a point is quickly reached where certain things can’t be bought at any price. For much of the AI supply chain we’ve already passed that point. Companies that locked in deals early might continue to get what’s being made, and the makers might do their best to expand capacity. But all that takes time, and so the rate of spending has to bend.

Stein’s Law is now in effect:

If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.

Notes

[1] 35-50% of planned AI data centres are behind schedule
[2] Tom’s Hardware now has a headline category for RAM Shortage



No Responses Yet to “Brewster’s Trillions”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.